By Daniel R. Huebner
George Herbert Mead is a foundational determine in sociology, most sensible identified for his ebook Mind, Self, and Society, which was once prepare after his demise from direction notes taken by way of stenographers and scholars and from unpublished manuscripts. Mead, besides the fact that, by no means taught a path basically housed in a sociology division, and he wrote a couple of big range of themes some distance outdoors of the worries for which he's predominantly rememberedincluding experimental and comparative psychology, the historical past of technological know-how, and relativity theory. in brief, he's recognized in a self-discipline within which he didn't educate for a e-book he didn't write.
turning into Mead, Daniel R. Huebner strains the ways that wisdom has been produced by way of and in regards to the famed American thinker. rather than treating Mead’s complex recognition as a separate subject of analysis from his highbrow biography, Huebner considers either biography and popularity as social procedures of data creation. He makes use of Mead as a case examine and offers clean new solutions to severe questions within the social sciences, comparable to how authors grow to be thought of canonical particularly disciplines, how teachers comprehend and use others’ works of their learn, and the way claims to authority and data are made in scholarship. Becoming Mead presents a unique tackle the heritage of sociology, putting it in serious discussion with cultural sociology and the sociology of data and intellectuals.
Read or Download Becoming Mead: The Social Process of Academic Knowledge PDF
Best social philosophy books
Movie and feminine attention appears at a gaggle of flicks which provide new and unique representations of women's interiority and individuality: within the lower (2003), misplaced in Translation (2003), and Morvern Callar (2002). Lucy Bolton compares those movies with these which provide extra general — albeit provocative and fascinating — remedies of girl subjectivity: Klute (1971), The Seven 12 months Itch (1955), and Marnie (1964).
This ebook explores and information the reality (Aktualität) of Hegel’s social and political philosophy--its relevance, topicality, and modern validity. It asserts--against the assumptions of these in a variety of traditions--that Hegel’s proposal not just continues to be suitable to debates in present social and political idea, yet is able to productively improving and enriching these debates.
- Politics and the Criteria of Truth
- Equality: From Theory to Action
- Topophobia: A Phenomenology of Anxiety
- Moral Rightness
- Interpretation and Explanation in the Human Sciences
- The Protestant Ethic Debate: Weber’s Replies to His Critics, 1907-1910
Extra resources for Becoming Mead: The Social Process of Academic Knowledge
The rhetorical conventions of public speaking pervade Mead’s work, and indeed there is a play back and forth between the form and content of his work that only becomes apparent when seen as public speech. His existing publication record is evidence at least in part of intimate and meaningful social relationships among colleagues and does not serve as a clear indication of an accumulating set of defi nite propositions or concepts Mead felt were his own. In this sense, studying the content of Mead’s published works also means examining their location in a process of social actions.
But for nearly half of these talks there is some additional information, either from summaries in newspaper articles or other periodicals, or because the talks can be plausibly matched to known works or manuscripts of Mead that still exist. 28 Chapter One It becomes clear in working through these materials that Mead was almost assuredly known in his own lifetime more widely for his public reform efforts than for his contributions to professional philosophy or social thought. An announcement for an address he was to give at the University of Kansas in 1911, for example, noted, “Mr.
Ch apter Two Laboratory Science W here did Mead look for his evidence? What did he do in order to try out ideas or check facts? Where do we fi nd what we might call Mead’s own process of discovery? If we are interested in knowledge production as an active, practical endeavor experienced emphatically by the knowledge producers, and not merely the abstract movement of ideas, then these questions are crucial. With regard to Mead, the obvious fi rst answer to this set of questions is that he made reference to immediate social experience.